Legal Opinion

Howell v. McCarty

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County. Suit by Eli Iiowcll and others against- Cam L. McCarty and -others. From decree for defendants, plaintiff appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, Judge:

Howell Brothers Company were dealers in Texas real estate, buying and selling the same for profit, at the time of the transaction involved in this litigation. Cam L. McCarty was, during the same time, their agent to solicit and make sales of lofs of different dimensions and accept nego-itable notes as evidence of the consideration for such sales, subject to their approval. To W. F. Kahler and H. M. Mitchell McCarty sold lots pursuant to such authority, and from them took negotiable notes payable to Howell Brothers Company. These notes the company endorsed in blank and delivered…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. PrentissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Bank v. Ohio Valley Furniture Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lawrence v. Stonington BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
  4. Atlas National Bank v. SaveryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Baird v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1797

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Keatley v. Hanna Chevrolet Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Shaeffer v. BurtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Averill v. O'FarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. In Re RogersDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API