Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Ferguson Moving & Storage Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1956No. 8186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

At the conclusion of the evidence, the Court of Common Pleas sustained the defendant’s motion for an instructed verdict and thereafter entered judgment on the verdict thus rendered. This appeal challenges the validity of this action of the trial court.

The undisputed evidence is that Pearl Assurance Company, Ltd., a plaintiff herein and hereinafter called Pearl, issued a master policy insuring ‘ ‘ Oliver Skellet and Thomas Skellet, J r., d. b. a. Skellett Company and/or Skellet Company, lessor,” against liability which they might incur as a carrier of freight and authorizing them to issue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Small v. WegnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Hanlon v. J. E. Miller Transfer & Storage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Layton v. Ferguson Moving & Storage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API