Pollock v. Lippmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order granting motion to cancel notice of lis ;pendens upon undertaking filed reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the papers before the Special Term the case was not within the provisions of section 1671 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Tishman v. Acritelli, 111 App. Div. 237; Wolinsky v. Okun, Id. 536; Schenkein v. Horowitz, 51 Misc. Rep. 80; Kennedy v. Hall, Id. 78.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tishman v. AcritelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Schenkein v. HorowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1906