Legal Opinion
Romano v. Perales
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (110 AD2d 1028).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Romano v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Forsyth County Board of Social Services v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Weinberg v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- O'Rourke v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993