Legal Opinion

State v. Satterwhite

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, I.

Tbe evidence for tbe State tended to show that Cecil Ingram, tbe defendant, and some other Negroes were playing “skin”; that tbe defendant accused Ingram of taking $10.00 of bis money from tbe table; that Ingram denied taking it; that tbe defendant cursed Ingram, and shot bim witb a pistol, tbe bullet going through bis body; that Ingram bad no weapon.

Tbe defendant’s evidence tended to show these facts. While they were playing “skin,” tbe defendant shuffled tbe cards, and placed tbe deck on tbe table. Ingram bad four cards, and picked up tbe deck to draw. Tbe *675defendant bad $16.00 on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. State v. . GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. State v. . AbsherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API