Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baldwin v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 25, 2007No. 14-06-00632-CRPublished

1DissentJohn S. Anderson, Justice

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, in part, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated[.]” U.S. Const. amend. IV. At every level of the detention, search, and arrest of appellant, appellant’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated by Deputy Smith. Nevertheless, the majority utilizes sophistry to sustain Deputy Smith’s unlawful search and seizure, thus damaging appellant’s reputation with an illegitimate arrest for merely walking down a public sidewalk.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Dowthitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API