Legal Opinion

Schonwit v. Schonwit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief in which a judgment of divorce was entered February 6, 1990, upon the defendant husband’s default in answering, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Corso, J.H.O.), dated April 12, 1991, which, after a hearing, granted the defendant husband’s motion to disqualify the plaintiff wife’s attorney.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The wife, represented by the attorney whom the former *781husband now seeks to disqualify, commenced this divorce action in April 1989.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aversa v. TaubesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eisenstadt v. EisenstadtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. McDade v. McDadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Harnett v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Weissman v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API