Legal Opinion

State v. Thacker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1977No. 12215PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

On appeal from a conviction for involuntary manslaughter, the defendant-appellant Johnny Thacker seeks to have his judgment of conviction set aside on the ground that when accepting his plea of guilty, the trial court failed to advise him of his presumption of innocence, of the state’s burden of proof, and of the defense of mental disability. Appellant also contends that the order of commitment should be reversed because the presentence report was inadequate and the sentence imposed was excessive. We affirm both the judgment of conviction and the order of commitment.

Appellant pleaded guilty…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. ColyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. GishIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. WallaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. RoderickIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. BirruetaIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. MattesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schmidt v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API