Legal Opinion

Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Hall

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 6, 1991No. Civ. 7039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This workmen’s compensation case has been reviewed by this court previously. See, Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. John Carl Hall, 516 So.2d 690 (Ala.Civ.App.1987). There, we reversed the trial court award, which was based on a finding of 80% permanent partial reduction in earning capacity, because there was no evidence in the record rebutting the presumption raised by the employee’s higher post-injury wages. In that opinion, we noted the fact that the employee’s post-injury earnings exceeded his pre-injury earnings; however, that fact alone does not necessarily preclude a finding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte St. Regis Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Cullman Broadcasting Co. v. BosleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. ForemanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Argo v. WalstonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Argo v. WalstonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API