People v. Fennell
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentWhite, J.
I respectfully dissent. The instruction given failed to convey the essential elements of the offense, and defendant is therefore entitled to a new trial. The statute uses the words “willfully” and “maliciously.” At a minimum, this phrase requires that a defendant either intend to kill, torture, mutilate, maim, or disfigure an animal, or act with a heedless disregard that the prohibited harm is a plain and strong likelihood. The instruction given permitted the jury to convict defendant on a finding that he threw a firecracker in the direction of the bam, knowing that it was wrong to do so,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- People v. NowackMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. MinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. PetheramMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.