Holt v. Holt

JOHN Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

This case arose out of a dispute concerning the division of the parties’ retirement annuities. During their marriage, both of the parties were participants in federal retirement programs administered by the Office of Personnel Management. Their 1988 divorce decree included findings that the retirement plans were marital property, and that each of the parties was entitled to one-half of the other’s retirement benefits accrued during the marriage.

Appellee continued to work for the federal government until 1998, and his salary increased. When he retired, the Office of…