Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 24, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order denying a preliminary injunction (103 Fed. 491), which order was entered July 17, 1900, on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal. By section 7 of the act of March 3,1891, establishing circuit courts of appeals, there was no provision authorizing the taking of an appeal from an order refusing a pre*623liminary injunction. This section was amended, however, by chapter 96 of the Statutes at Large of 1895, approved February 18, 1895, so as to read as follows:

“That whore, upon a hearing in equity in a district…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newhall v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Berliner Gramophone Co. v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
  3. Berliner Gramophone Co. v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
  4. National Automatic Mach. Co. v. Automatic Weighing, Lifting & Grip Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
  5. Omaha & S. W. R. Co. v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API