Legal Opinion · Concurrence

MEYER v. ENGLE

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 2016No. MA-2015-874Published

1Concurrence

SMITH, Presiding Judge,

Specially Concurring.

T1 I agree with the majority that this Application is not properly before this Court. I write separately to emphasize that, under our Rules, we cannot accept Meyer's Application or rule on the merits of his claim that his original filing in this Court was not time-barred. This Court's Rules have the force of statute, and we are bound by them. 22 0,8.2011, § 1051(b). We dismissed Meyer's original petition for extraordinary relief. That ruling was a final order, and there is no rehearing from that order. Rule 10.6(D), Rules of the Oklahoma Court of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leftwich v. AlcornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API