Legal Opinion

U-Haul of Oregon v. Burtis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1993No. 90-19778; CA A71433PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant’s compensable injury was the major contributing cause of his disability and need for treatment, including surgery. Employer argues that the Board misapplied ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) or, in the alternative, that its findings are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

Claimant has worked for 29 years as a mechanic and repairman for employer. For approximately four hours each day, he works lying down on a creeper underneath trailers with his neck hyperextended. For the remainder of the workday, his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API