Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bourke

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1991No. 90-177Published

1DissentFahrnbruch, J.

While I agree with the majority’s analysis that the phrase used in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-311.01(l)(c) (Reissue 1989) is not unconstitutionally vague, I must dissent on the basis that no final order was entered by the trial court, and, therefore, the State’s appeal is not properly before us.

The county attorney may take exception to any ruling or decision of the court made during the prosecution of a cause by presenting to the trial court the application for leave to docket an appeal to the Supreme Court with reference to the rulings or decisions of which complaint is made. . .. Such application…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huffman v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. J.L. Healy Construction Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. LinnNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. HutterNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API