Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kaplan, Trading as Broad Ser. Sta.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1933No. Appeal, 256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The Commonwealth sued defendant, a dealer in liquid fuels, to recover $366.60 alleged to be due as gasoline tax collected by defendant under the provisions of the Act of May 1,1929, P. L. 1037, for the months of October and November, 1930, and May, 1931. The amount claimed for May, i. e., $102.27, with interest, was admitted by defendant to be due. Liability for the balance was denied on the ground that checks for the sums in question had been sent to the Department of Revenue by defendant on November 15, 1930, and December 15,1930, respectively. These checks were drawn on the Bank…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schoyer v. Comet Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Nason v. Directors of the PoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Furman University v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Garcia, D., Aplt. v. American EagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Garcia, D., Aplt. v. Foot LockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API