Legal Opinion

Davison v. West Oxford Land Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

MotioN to dismiss appeal of plaintiff from judment rendered against bim at July, 1896, Term of Gbanviilb Superior Court, before Mclver, J. •

1Opinion of the Court

ClaeK, J.:

This is a motion to docket and dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal in this case under Rule 17. It appears that the term of the court below, at which the trial was had, began before the first day of this term of this court, but that it did not adjourn till after the term here had begun. While such appeal might be docketed at this term, this is not imperative (Rule 5, Porter v. R. Co., 106 N. C., 478), and the motion to docket and dismiss must be denied. The rule that the term of a court is considered as one day and that all judgments date as of the first day of the term (Farley v. Lea, 20…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Worthy v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Gwinn v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Turrentine v. . Richmond Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Clifton v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farley v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  2. Houston v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API