Legal Opinion

Mount v. Howell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On quo warranto. On demurrer to plea.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The controversy is over the office of assessor, in the city of Yew Brunswick, and the pertinent statute is the act of 1905 (Pamph. L., p. 75; Comp. Stat., p. 5163, pl. 151, &c.), providing in substance that in cities of a population between fifteen thousand and thirty-five thousand the council may appoint three assessors to hold office for three years from January 1st next preceding the date of their appointment and until their successors are appointed and qualify; vacancies for any cause to be filled for the unexpired *488lerm only; the city to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Werts v. RogersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  2. Sneath v. MagerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McCarthy v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Stephenson v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API