Legal Opinion

Delaney v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 2025No. 4:21-cv-00544Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MICHAEL DELANEY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-CV-544-GAG-SH CITY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, Circuit Judge.1 Before this Court are the following four motions: (1) Defendant City of Tulsa, Oklahoma's ("Defendant Tulsa") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 56); (2) Defendant Aaron Russell ("Defendant Russell") motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 61); (3) Defendant Russell's motion in limine (Dkt. No. 67); and (4) Defendant Tulsa's motion in limine (Dkt. No. 68). For the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API