Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wasser v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 25, 1998No. 97-1735Published

1DissentW. Sharp, Judge

I respectfully dissent because in my view there is a disputed material fact question as to whether Jones was acting as a broker in this transaction. The case was heard below pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes “Additional Procedures Applicable to Hearings Not Involving Disputed Issues of Material Fact,” a kind of summary judgment proceeding. Thus I would remand the cause for an evidentiary hearing.

Based on the documents of record, a reasonable interpretation of them is that Jones initiated this transaction in his capacity as a broker/lieensee. He listed Wasser’s home with his real…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riggs v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Dullea v. Department of Business Regulation, Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API