Legal Opinion · Dissent

MADISON TWO ASSOCIATES v. Pappas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 2007No. 1-04-0911Published

1DissentJustice O’Hara Frossard

I agree with the majority that in the instant tax assessment objection case the Code of Civil Procedure rather than the Property Tax Code regulates intervention. I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court’s denial of the petitions to intervene must be reversed and the case remanded with directions to hold a hearing to determine whether petitioners have satisfied the intervention requirements under section 2 — 408(a)(2) or section 2 — 408(a)(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 408(a)(2), (a)(3) (West 2002) (Civil Code). The petitions to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clarendon Associates v. KorzenIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bell v. Louisville & NashVille RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People Ex Rel. Ingram v. Wasson Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Warbucks Investments Limited Partnership v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API