MADISON TWO ASSOCIATES v. Pappas
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice O’Hara Frossard
I agree with the majority that in the instant tax assessment objection case the Code of Civil Procedure rather than the Property Tax Code regulates intervention. I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court’s denial of the petitions to intervene must be reversed and the case remanded with directions to hold a hearing to determine whether petitioners have satisfied the intervention requirements under section 2 — 408(a)(2) or section 2 — 408(a)(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 408(a)(2), (a)(3) (West 2002) (Civil Code). The petitions to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clarendon Associates v. KorzenIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Bell v. Louisville & NashVille RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- People Ex Rel. Ingram v. Wasson Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Warbucks Investments Limited Partnership v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993