Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Roverud

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Houston county, Farmer, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

It appears from the complaint and the exhibits attached that in January, 1874, the plaintiff paid into the treasury of Houston county, of which defendant is auditor, $110 for the purchase of certain lands in that county, claimed to have become, prior to that time, forfeited to the state under Gen. St. (1866,) c. 11, at a tax sale, and to have become the absolute property of the state, and subject to sale on the direction of the state auditor, who had directed them to be sold at private sale; and that thereupon the then auditor of the county executed to the plaintiff a deed therefor, pursuant…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Merrill v. DearingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Blakemore v. CooperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State ex rel. National Bond & Security Co. v. KrahmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Slingerland v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Paine v. Dickey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API