Hagan v. Platt
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, V. C.
This is a bill by a trustee under a voluntary settlement against his cesituis , que trust for'a settlement of his accounts and for directions.
The only question requiring consideration is as to the apportionment between tenant for life and remainderman of a loss arising upon one of the investments of the fund. The investment was a mortgage of $1,200 upon real estate, and there was a default of interest in July, 1272. A foreclosure resulted, and the property was purchased by the trustee and finally sold in 1888, realizing only a trifle over the original investment, leaving a large…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Equitable Trust Co. v. SwobodaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- San Antonio Loan & Trust Co. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Hudson County National Bank v. WoodruffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Skinner v. BoydNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Burnett v. WitschiefNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.