Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Platt

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

This is a bill by a trustee under a voluntary settlement against his cesituis , que trust for'a settlement of his accounts and for directions.

The only question requiring consideration is as to the apportionment between tenant for life and remainderman of a loss arising upon one of the investments of the fund. The investment was a mortgage of $1,200 upon real estate, and there was a default of interest in July, 1272. A foreclosure resulted, and the property was purchased by the trustee and finally sold in 1888, realizing only a trifle over the original investment, leaving a large…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Equitable Trust Co. v. SwobodaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. San Antonio Loan & Trust Co. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hudson County National Bank v. WoodruffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  4. Skinner v. BoydNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  5. Burnett v. WitschiefNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API