Legal Opinion

Samuel Gold v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 20, 1967No. 16616_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, a civilian employee at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, sustained injuries while performing his duties. He was furnished medical and surgical treatment by the defendant United States at the Philadelphia Naval Hospital. He brought this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act seeking damages from the United States for alleged malpractice in the treatment accorded to him at the Naval Hospital.

The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the United States on the ground that the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 751 et seq., to which…

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Austin v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1981
  2. Charles M. Vander v. United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Western Regional Office United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Betty D. McCall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Schmid, Jr., Christian C. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. Wilder v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API