People v. Hazelton
California Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceMosk, J.
I concur in the result that the majority reach, viz., affirmance of
the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
But I concur only in the majority’s result. I cannot join in their discussion, which, as will appear, is not only unnecessary but also unsound.
*110I
This cause involves both of the two statutes popularly referred to as the “Three Strikes and You’re Out” laws.
Penal Code section 667 was amended by the Legislature, effective March 7, 1994, to establish a sentencing scheme, in its subdivisions (b) through (i), for fixing the term of imprisonment for any person convicted of a felony who had previously…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.