Legal Opinion

Baer v. Rosenblatt

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 6, 1964No. 5211PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lamerón, J.

On April 15, 1950, the Belknap county commissioners who had the legal control of the Belknap Recreational Area at Gilford, hired the plaintiff, Frank (Fritzie) P. Baer, as supervisor of the area. Their written agreement provided that Frank P. Baer will “supervise the collection and disbursement of all funds coming from or disbursed on account of said recreational area” {par. 5); “transmit all funds accruing from said recreational area to said county commissioners” {par. 6); “carefully examine all bills and invoices submitted relative to said recreational area and either approve or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jeffrey Kassel v. Gannett Co., Inc., D/B/A "Usa Today,"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Duchesnaye v. Munro Entersprises, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. Thomson v. CashSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. John J. O'Brien v. Papa Gino's of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API