Hernandez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of murder and assessed punishment at fifty (50) years confinement. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction holding that reputation testimony from two witnesses, based solely on conversations with others within the community about appellant’s prior bad acts, violated the rule of Wagner v. State, 687 S.W.2d 303 (Tex.Cr.App.1985) (opinion on rehearing). Hernandez v. State, 767 S.W.2d 902 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1989) (opinion on original submission). They also decided, after the filing of a State’s petition for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Purtell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
4Cited by27 opinions
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Rawlings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- State v. Dickerson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.