Clark v. Randall
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR TO CIRCUIT COURT, MILWAUKEE COUNTY. The facts in this case aie sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Cole, J.
The circumstances under which this suit was brought may be stated succinctly as follows: The plaintiffs in error, residing in New York City, employed the defendants in error,'attorneys at law, and at the time living in Milwaukee, to bring suit upon, and collect and secure certain claims belonging to them against their debtors in this *136state. In the prosecution and transaction of this business, thus entrusted to them, the attorneys, it appears, sued out a certain execution, for the purpose of having a levy made upon a stock of goods, which they undoubtedly supposed, and had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holker v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Union Bank of Georgetown v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Briggs v. Town of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
- Spalding v. NolcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
3Cited by16 opinions
- White v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Davis v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- National Bank of the Republic v. Old Town Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
- Luce v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Shattuck v. BillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.