Legal Opinion

GUY v. OTTINO

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided July 24, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00543Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION DANTE D. GUY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:22-cv-00543-JMS-MJD ) JUSTIN OTTINO and JASON BROWN, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Dante D. Guy seeks recovery pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for an alleged unlawful search and seizure that violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment, which was conducted by Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department ("IMPD") Officer Jason Brown and Parole Agent Justin Ottino. [Filing No. 1 at 1.] Officer Brown and Parole Agent Ottino have each filed Motions for Summary…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API