Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Zimmer, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 2021No. 1:17-cv-02119Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK er ae ee en ea eee ee ee eee IN RE: ZIMMER M/L TAPER HIP : PROSTHESIS OR M/L TAPER : MDL NC. 2859 HIP PROSTHESIS WITH KINECTIV : TECHNOLOGY AND : 18-MD-2859 (PAC) VERSYS FEMORAL HEAD PRODUCTS : 18-MC-2859 (PAC) LIABILITY LITIGATION : : ORDER NO. 61 This Document Relates to All Cases : re re re en tn ta a a Zimmer asks the Court to limit Plaintiff Nutting’s affirmative deposition designations to 15 hours’ worth of testimony, arguing that Plaintiff's current designations (which Zimmer estimates at 50 hours’ worth) are overbroad in light…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hardy v. Town of GreenwichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Lidle v. Cirrus Design CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Evans v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003