Legal Opinion

Tynan v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 29, 2009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles F. Tynan appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court dismissing his complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief. The single justice based his decision on the doctrine of claim preclusion. He determined that the present action is essentially identical to an earlier, unsuccessful action that Tynan recently prosecuted in this court. See Citizens Comm. for Judicial Oversight & Governmental Reform v. Attorney Gen., 451 Mass. 1010 (2008). We affirm.

1. Tynan has submitted a multitude of papers to the court in this case, but nothing resembling an appellate brief or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kobrin v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. DaLuz v. Department of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Citizens Committee for Judicial Oversight & Governmental Reform v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Willowdale LLC v. Board of Assessors of TopsfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  2. Mouded v. Khoury, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  3. Baker v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPMassachusetts Superior Court · 2016
  4. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. FedericoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. In re EstateMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API