Legal Opinion

Skinner v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 30, 1985No. 65510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We accepted jurisdiction because of direct and express conflict between the case here, Skinner v. State, 450 So.2d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), and Golden v. State, 120 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). Since that time the First District Court of Appeal has receded from Golden and expressly adopted the reasoning of the case here, Skinner, and Ballard v. State, 447 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). See Carter v. State, 469 So.2d 775 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), panel decision adopted by court en banc April 25, 1985. The conflict having been resolved while this cause has been pending, we exercise our discretion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Golden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Skinner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Ballard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KettellSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Holtsclaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. William J. Mitchell v. David W. RaceSupreme Court of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API