Legal Opinion

Camp v. Camp

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Three motions: (1) for a money judgment for arrears in alimony, (2) cross motion by the defendant for an accounting by the plaintiff as a receiver in sequestration, and (3) by the plaintiff as receiver for permission to proceed with the sale of premises located at 26 Lucille Drive, Syosset, New York.

The defendant is in arrears in the payment of alimony directed by a judgment of separation dated July 15, 1959 (21 Misc 2d 908, 21 Misc 2d 563). The plaintiff may apply for a *131money judgment even though she is the receiver in sequestration, for as provided in section 1171-b of the Civil Practice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camp v. CampNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Camp v. CampNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API