Chilson v. Churan

The first claim as to the amount of recovery, is that it was manifestly against the weight of the evidence. It appears that the plaintiff below was engaged in doing the class of work that was required to be done in this case, and that the defendant below was the .owner of the property upon which this work was being done. We will refer to these parties as they appeared, plaintiff and defendant, in the court below.

The parties agree that there had been some talk about doing this work prior to the making of the contract. Plaintiff claims, as far as the contract is concerned, it was first proposed…