Campbell v. Colonial Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
This appeal arises from an alleged breach of a loan commitment agreement. The trial court ruled that certain testimony offered by the plaintiffs was inadmissible, both under Ala.Code 1975, § 12-21-163 (the dead man’s statute), and under the parol evidence rule. Therefore, the trial court held that the plaintiffs had failed to establish substantial evidence to rebut the defendants’ prima facie showing that there existed a genuine issue of material fact and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
On September 12, 1984, Supermug Company, Inc. (“Supermug”),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Stanley v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Mountain v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Redmond v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Beddingfield v. Central Bank of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schoenvogel v. Venator Group Retail, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004