Doe v. Karpf
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Daniel R. Palmieri, J.
The motion by plaintiffs counsel for approval of a contingent fee in an amount greater than allowed by Judiciary Law § 474-a *230is granted. Plaintiffs counsel shall be permitted to receive a fee of 30% of the net recovery after deduction of allowable expenses and disbursements.
This is one of those rare cases presenting the requisite “extraordinary circumstances” warranting the award of an increased fee. (Contorino v Florida Ob/Gyn Assn., 283 AD2d 67 [2d Dept 2001].)
Plaintiffs counsel moves pursuant to Judiciary Law § 474-a (4) for approval by this court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yalango v. PoppNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Contorino v. Florida Ob/Gyn Ass'n, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- O'Connell v. ShivaramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re LaFave, Wein & Frament, PLLCNew York Supreme Court · 2011