Legal Opinion

Doe v. Karpf

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel R. Palmieri, J.

The motion by plaintiffs counsel for approval of a contingent fee in an amount greater than allowed by Judiciary Law § 474-a *230is granted. Plaintiffs counsel shall be permitted to receive a fee of 30% of the net recovery after deduction of allowable expenses and disbursements.

This is one of those rare cases presenting the requisite “extraordinary circumstances” warranting the award of an increased fee. (Contorino v Florida Ob/Gyn Assn., 283 AD2d 67 [2d Dept 2001].)

Plaintiffs counsel moves pursuant to Judiciary Law § 474-a (4) for approval by this court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yalango v. PoppNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Contorino v. Florida Ob/Gyn Ass'n, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. O'Connell v. ShivaramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re LaFave, Wein & Frament, PLLCNew York Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API