Harris v. Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Viewing the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, as we are required to do on motion to nonsuit, it appears to be sufficient to carry the case to the jury, albeit the damages shown would seem to be slight or only nominal. See Gulley v. Raynor, 185 N. C., 96, 116 S. E., 171; Perry v. Kime, 169 N. C., 540, 86 S. E., 337; Machine Co. v. Tobacco Co., 141 N. C., 284, 53 S. E., 885; Herring v. Armwood, 130 N. C., 177, 41 S. E., 96; Spencer v. Hamilton, 113 N. C., 49, 18 S. E., 167.
Reversed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Machine Co. v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Spencer v. . HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Herring v. Armwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Perry v. . KimeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Gulley v. . RaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923