Legal Opinion · Dissent

Botsch v. Reisdorff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1975No. 39581Published

1DissentMcCown, J.

I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which holds the Nebraska guest statute constitutional. The basic reasons are set forth in my dissent in Hale v. Taylor, 192 Neb. 298, 220 N. W. 2d 378.

Rational and logical arguments may be made in support of each of the two divergent judicial views regarding the constitutionality of automobile guest statutes. In weighing the conflicting viewpoints, the unequal justice visited upon thousands of guest passengers in the name of legislative public policy becomes the critical weight which tips the scales of justice in favor of the determination…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hale v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API