Legal Opinion

People v. Ny Sam Chung

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1892No. 20876PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The defendants were prosecuted in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco for the offense of petit larceny in stealing one gold *305bracelet of the value of twenty-seven dollars, the property of Jeong Koong. A jury trial was waived, and after the evidence was concluded, upon the suggestion of the prosecuting attorney that the property was taken from the person of said Koong, and that therefore the offense was grand larceny, the court ordered the action dismissed. The defendants were thereafter placed upon trial in the superior court upon a charge of grand larceny upon an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. HunckelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State v. WilesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Paulson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API