Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Kelsey

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 13, 1996No. 5:94:CV:169PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARTIAL JUDGMENT

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

In accordance with the Opinion entered on this date;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (dkt. #20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED so for as all defendants are entitled to JUDGMENT on all Fourteenth Amendment claims and the Fourth Amendment claims of excessive force and unlawful seizure, and Sheriff Kelsey is entitled to JUDGMENT on the failure to train theory of liability.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is DENIED with regard to the Eighth Amendment…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richman v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Foust v. McNeillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Petersen v. MidgettDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  4. Stein v. Kent State University Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  5. Hammond v. Lapeer CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API