Legal Opinion

Falkel v. Moore

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1884Published

Appeal from an order of Wyoming Special Term, denying the defendants’ motion for a retaxation of costs. An action was commenced in a Justice’s Court in which the defendants interposed a plea of title. This action was then commenced in the Supreme Court. Upon a reference of the issues, a judgment, for twelve cents was directed in favor of the plaintiff. Costs were taxed in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

.Smith, P. J.:

The plaintiff complained that the defendants “ wrongfully broke, tore down and destroyed ” a large quantity of fence erected and standing on land, of which plaintiff was in possession.

The defendants pleaded, first, setting up a general denial, and, secondly, admitting the plaintiff’s possession of the land and alleg*294ing that they had a right of way across said land, they to keep the gates or bars of the fences closed when they shall have passed through; that on the occasion mentioned in the complaint they did pass over said land, when they had said right of way, until they found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rathbone v. . McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Morss v. . SalisburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Burhans v. TibbitsNew York Supreme Court · 1852

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API