Kairis v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
The applicable statute of limitations for a claim of excessive confinement in the prison disciplinary context depends on whether the claim is predicated on intentional or negligent conduct (see Court of Claims Act § 10 [3], [3-b]; Ramirez v State of New York, 171 Misc 2d 677, 680-682 [1997]; cf. Vazquez v State of New York, 23 Misc 3d 1101[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50527[U], *2 n 2 [2009], affd 77 AD3d 1229 [2010]). Such a claim accrues “upon a claimant’s release from confinement” (Davis v State of New York, 89 AD3d 1287, 1287 [2011]).
Here, claimant’s contentions regarding his 2007 confinement are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Davis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Loret v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ramirez v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1997
- Varela v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Trammell v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019