Legal Opinion

Kairis v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 16, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

The applicable statute of limitations for a claim of excessive confinement in the prison disciplinary context depends on whether the claim is predicated on intentional or negligent conduct (see Court of Claims Act § 10 [3], [3-b]; Ramirez v State of New York, 171 Misc 2d 677, 680-682 [1997]; cf. Vazquez v State of New York, 23 Misc 3d 1101[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50527[U], *2 n 2 [2009], affd 77 AD3d 1229 [2010]). Such a claim accrues “upon a claimant’s release from confinement” (Davis v State of New York, 89 AD3d 1287, 1287 [2011]).

Here, claimant’s contentions regarding his 2007 confinement are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Davis v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Loret v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Ramirez v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1997
  5. Varela v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trammell v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API