Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Statum

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2002No. S097715Published

1Dissent

KENNARD, J., Dissenting.

The majority holds that a superior court judgment imposing a misdemeanor sentence for a “wobbler” offense is “[a]n order . . . modifying the offense to a lesser offense” (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(6)) and thus an order from which the People may appeal. I disagree. The sentence imposed on a wobbler determines the grade or class of the crime as either a felony or a misdemeanor, but the sentence imposed does not change the nature or identity of the offense and so does not modify the offense to a lesser offense. Therefore, I would hold that the People may not appeal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API