Legal Opinion
Teagen Co. v. Bor. of Bergenfield
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 5, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
119 N.J. Super. 212 (1972)
290 A.2d 753
THE TEAGEN COMPANY, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND THE WOODFIELD COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BOROUGH OF BERGENFIELD, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 5, 1972.
Mr. Jerome C. Eisenberg and Mr. Raymond A. Noble for plaintiffs (Messrs. Clapp & Eisenberg, attorneys).
Mr. Jack Geddy Goldberg for defendant (Mr. Pierce H. Deamer, Jr., attorney).
GELMAN, J.J. & D.R.C. (temporarily assigned).
In this action in lieu of prerogative writs plaintiffs challenge the validity of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berk Cohen Associates at Rustic Village, LLC v. Bor. of ClaytonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Sands v. Township of East WindsorNew Jersey Superior Court · 1988