Legal Opinion
Hartley v. Nash
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 24, 1924No. 3754PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, C. J".
(After stating the foregoing facts.) There is but one question presented by the record in this ease. Is a county liable as any other individual would be for the payment of interest upon a valid obligation of this municipal subdivision? Or, to state the question in another form, is there any reason why the provisions of § 3434 of the Civil Code of 1910 should rest less heavily upon either the State or any subdivision of the government than it should lie upon an individual? The writer has already expressed his view upon this subject in the case of Citizens Bank of Moultrie v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Epping v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- City of Atlanta v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Park v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Heard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Cone v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ditmyer v. American Liberty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Gaston v. Shunk Plow Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Americus Grocery Co. v. Pitts Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Board of Drainage Commissioners v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.