Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1891No. 15,697PublishedCited by 17 opinions
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlds, C. J.
The appellant was indicted by the grand jury at the November term, 1889, of the Hamilton Circuit Court, for assault and battery upon one Edith Hinkle.
The appellant filed an answer in abatement, challenging the jurisdiction of the circuit court on the ground of the ap*491pellant being the father of the said Edith Hinkle, and at the time of the alleged assault and battery she was about twelve years of age, and was under the custody of her father, the appellant.
It is contended that in such cases the circuit court has no jurisdiction, the jurisdiction having been conferred on justices of the peace,…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Newby v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Treschman v. TreschmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- State v. StraightMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Clasen v. Pruhs ex rel. PruhsNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.