Legal Opinion

State v. Hammond

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1964No. 36825PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was found guilty of grand larceny by means of a bank check. From a judgment and sentence of imprisonment entered upon the verdict, he appeals, assigning two errors.

His first assignment of error urges that instruction No. 4 defining in the language of the statute the gross misdemeanor of unlawful issuance of bank checks or drafts (RCW 9.54.050) probably misled and confused the jury in assessing his guilt or innocence under an information charging grand larceny as defined by RCW 9.54.090(5). The information charged that appellant, on or about April 6,1959, with intent to defraud,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HartleyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. VindhurstWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. HeslinWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Almy v. KvammeWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SilversWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. LittleUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. CallasWashington Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API