Legal Opinion

In re Hartung

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 2, 1941No. 4500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacksoN, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner rejecting, for want of patentable distinction over an interference issue, claims 1, 3, 5, and 26 of an application for a patent for new and useful improvements in alkyl catechols. The rejected claims are for alleged new products. Six method claims were allowed.

The rejected claims read as follows:

1. As new products, alkyl catechols with more than three -and not more than eight carbon atoms in the side chain.

3. As new products, compounds of the class consisting…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re RuffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  2. Application of Edgar E. Ruff and Robert E. DukeshireCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. In re Retail Clerks International Protective Ass'nCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  4. Application of Jack W. HinmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Application of Edgar E. Ruff and Robert E. DukeshireCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API