Legal Opinion
Marks v. Frigidaire Sales Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 14, 1931No. 5197PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HITZ, Associate Justice.
This ease comes here by writ of error to the municipal court of the District of Columbia to review a judgment upon a verdict directed by the court in an action of replevin.
The plaintiff below, defendant here, sold a Frigidaire to the defendant below, plaintiff in error, upon a conditional sales agreement whereby title to the machine remained in the seller until it was fully paid for.
The machine having been delivered to the purchaser, and default in payment having occurred, the seller brought its action of replevin for recovery of the machine; the purchaser pleaded a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Withers v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Clement v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Twilley v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- District of Columbia v. FaisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Davis v. Boyle Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Brown v. Randle & Garvin, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- McNeill v. JamisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Reiter v. Universal Marion CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.