Shoulson v. Shoulson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and cross motion granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: The court should have granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3016 (c) in this matrimonial action. Plaintiff failed to specify in the complaint "the time and place of each act complained of’ (CPLR 3016 [c]), and that failure cannot be cured by providing that information in a bill of particulars (see, Miglio v Miglio, 147 AD2d 460; Kapchan v Kapchan, 93 AD2d 880; Pustilnik v Pustilnik, 24 AD2d 868). The complaint is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miglio v. MiglioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Pustilnik v. PustilnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Kapchan v. KapchanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sullivan v. SullivanNew York Supreme Court · 1999